Sesame Summit 2026 – application open

Vincent Touati-Tomas

Intro

BEN: We’re conducting our first community spotlight. The idea is to ask one of our members to share everything about their life, career, and relationship to events. We have someone very well-suited for this.

As usual, we’ve been welcoming some guests (non-members), contributors, and friends subscribed to SELECTED. I hope some of them will soon become members to enjoy these sessions in the future.

Our guest today is Vincent Touati-Tomas. He’s French and started his career in tech as early as 2011. He has a very international background, working his way up from being an independent marketing freelance consultant to head of marketing and communication at Northzone – a major VC firm. They’ve backed companies like Spotify, iZettle, Avito, Kahoot!, Klarna, as well as the big event platform unicorn Hopin.

[00:01:27] Meet Vincent Touati-Tomas

We first met when I was hosting small events at the Silencio club in Paris. I’m not sure if he even had the legal age to enter the club at that time.

VINCENT: No, I didn’t.

BEN: You see… After that, he joined France Digitale at 20 years old, then the Daphni VC fund, then Founders Factory before Northzone.

That’s it for the bio, Vincent. How are you feeling today? Tell us a bit more about your work and why you’re here today.

VINCENT: I’m feeling great, thanks for having me. What you’re missing in the bio and our relationship is the amazing radio show we did a couple of years ago. We did this entrepreneurial show, “Let’s Talk
About Web, Baby.”

BEN: Well, I didn’t forget it. I just kept it under my belt to make it a surprise point. So yes, we did a radio show a few years ago, and Max was with us as a producer. So, why did you mention the show? Do you want to launch a new radio show? Maybe you prefer to do a Clubhouse show?

VINCENT: You know what? I wish I could do another radio show. It might be an open question because I do miss this regular catch-up with you guys. But I’m glad that I’m here today and able to talk about my
passion, which is communications and events as well. I’ve always been passionate about bringing people together. I think the startup and tech communities are the best communities for this.

[00:03:56] Northzone

VINCENT: Maybe I should explain a bit about Northzone and what we do.

Northzone is a pretty old firm; I was one year old when the firm was created. We’ve been investing in category-defining businesses such as Spotify, Klarna, iZettle to name a few. When I joined the VC community a couple of years ago, my role was very much a junior position. I was doing everything, a sort of unicorn role, if you will. I was handling everything from content to PR. When I joined Northzone, it was a significant moment in my career where I realised that for maybe the first time I had a role that perfectly fit my expertise.

BEN: I guess your job and your work at Northzone is also why people are joining us today. They want to hear more about what you do at these VC firms, and also how it is to do this from, how should I say it properly? Like a younger perspective. You’re probably in the millennial category, but you’re borderline Gen Z.

VINCENT: I’m already out of the scope for TikTok.

[00:05:42] Vincent’s work @Northzone

VINCENT: If I go back to the basics of what I’m doing in terms of my
daily job, I’m basically in charge of everything related to the brand.

Every time someone wants to interact with Northzone, or every time we
want to communicate something to the markets, I need to shape this
into a format that will work for the audience. That’s my job in a
nutshell. Since I’m talking to marketing experts here today, most of
the time that often means doing PR.

I work a lot with journalists, making sure they know exactly what
we’re up to and the type of companies we back. More recently, I’ve
been creating original content and ensuring we have a process in place
internally so we can be editorial about it. Because creating content
is one thing, but you really need to have an editorial strategy when
it comes to extracting opinions on deals, which are often very
financial or industry-driven. You really need to shape the
storytelling.

BEN: Wait, what are you trying to say? Is it about how you make boring
financial information interesting and sexy?

[00:07:06] How to make boring financial information “interesting & sexy”

VINCENT: The way I do this is by running editorial sessions, which are
sometimes boring, but I really try to make them better and more
engaging over time. It’s very much a conversation with the people who
know better than me. I just try to grill them with a lot of questions.
Then I take notes, and with this information I work with copywriters
on various outputs – either articles, opinion pieces, or events.

[00:07:40] Becoming a Hopin manager or Zoom Coordinator

VINCENT: Another aspect of my job involves organising events. We have
someone on the team now who’s in charge of events, both within our
portfolio and externally. Right now, she’s focusing a lot on virtual
events. If we were pre-COVID, she would very much be in charge of
physical events.

BEN: Instead of being an event manager, you could call her a Hopin
manager, right?

VINCENT: Yes, and that would be on-brand because we’ve invested in
Hopin. Of course, to produce online events, you now have Zoom
coordinators. I think that’s amazing because it really means it’s not
just a quick fix for the pandemic anymore. It’s something that’s going
to last. We could dive into this right away, but I think what’s
happening with Hopin is really interesting. I’m not talking only about
Hopin, but I think what’s happening with virtual event platforms is
amazing.

[00:08:51] Events to big media?

VINCENT: Whether it’s Hopin or another platform, they are turning into
media. It’s something we’ve talked about a lot together. Most of the
good events or good content producers are now turning into big media.
I see Sebastian (Toupy, former The Next Web) here, and I’m pretty sure
he’ll have things to say about this because the relationship between
media and events is especially blurry nowadays.

BEN: Sebastian, if you want to jump in, you can share some quick
feedback from your experience working at The Next Web. Actually, TNW
started as an event and then they started to do media because it was
like, “Okay, no one is talking about our events, so let’s do media.”
In a nutshell, you can hear the interview with Boris that Dan (Taylor)
did recently, but yeah, it’s happening again – events are now
announcing their own media.

VINCENT: And the other way around. If you look at Sifted, for example,
they would at some point have to invest in events as well. Right now,
they’re doing white papers and doing an amazing job on the press side
of things, but at some point they really need to do more events.

[00:10:07] Will people still pay for events?

VINCENT: Even today, events are something that people are ready to pay
for. So there’s a big market for events to become media, and media to
become events.

BEN: You’re saying that people are willing to pay for events? They’re
willing to pay for a media experience?

VINCENT: Yes, and this is actually a discussion I’ve had with many
event organisers. At the very beginning of the pandemic, people were
afraid to pay for event experiences, but now we’ve experience life
without event, it’s clear people want to pay for events.

[00:10:55] What are event organizers selling now? Do people want to buy tickets?

VINCENT: I think in our community, we’re just very picky. VCs are the
worst type of customer you can ever have because they will always
negotiate a 5k partnership or a 500€ euro ticket. They would pay 20K€
to have access to a data room or things like that. Even Eventbrite –
we thought Eventbrite was going to die because of the pandemic, but
actually, Eventbrite as a public company is thriving because they’re
selling a lot of tickets right now.

BEN: I see some comments here from Ana and Amanda about the fact that
Sifted is mentioning events in their membership. We’ve also heard a
lot of those conversations on our side where event organisers are
moving around, sort of avoiding the word “events” and instead saying,
“Oh, we’re selling you a community, and that includes events.” Because
if they’re just selling events per se within the tech industry,
there’s a reluctance to pay. Basically, people are just expecting it
to be free.

People are willing to pay for events, but not for content (or
conferences or talks) from our point of view. But then you have a
different point of view, Vincent. I know you say no, good content has
to be paid for. It’s normal that it costs money.

[00:12:18] Normalize paying for good content & events

VINCENT: Yeah, so I think we really need to be almost political about
this. As a communication person, I could say that 10 times a week I
have people asking me, “Oh, can you download this PDF from Business
Insider because I want to read this article?” Well, okay, pay for it.
So I’ve been this bad guy always saying, “Well, can you afford it? Pay
for it.” But I think there’s not this culture to pay for content
behind paywalls. It’s also the chicken and the egg problem.

If we don’t produce content behind paywalls, articles, or events, we
will never attract people. This is what we’re doing with the Sesame
community. Sifted did it super well – and I think this is a use case
that we would have to ask them about members, but I know that at least
within the VC community, it’s working pretty well.

I remember when I was an organizer of the France Digitale day, we were
giving away tickets because we just assumed that people would be happy
about it, but actually, in the long term, you don’t really create
long-lasting relationships. Slush is market leader on that topic. They
just don’t give away free tickets. And I think it’s very healthy for
the ecosystem because there is a business, there is teamwork behind
the scenes.

[00:14:25] Creating a content paywall

BEN: Sebastian, I was mentioning you earlier. I’m going to bring you
in to take the mic. You said on Tuesday (during our Coffee with
Sesame) that Sifted was very clever with the paywall they were using.
From your perspective as a user, you were like, “Oh, the articles I
actually want to read are all the ones that are behind the paywall.”
So they are smart enough to put the paywalls exactly where it’s going
to hit, you know, where you’re going to be like, “That’s exactly the
piece of content I want to read.”

SEBASTIAN: Yeah, totally. I think it’s very true. I agree with Vincent
that it’s very smart how they did it. I’ve been reading their
newsletters almost daily or every couple of days for a little while
now, and I sort of realised that all of the articles I tend to be
drawn towards are the ones they would make paid.

Then it’s funny, Vincent was mentioning that within the VC community
it’s working. I was on the main site today, which I almost never visit
– I often read the stuff through the newsletter but don’t visit the
Sifted website. A lot of the VC-related articles, the ones that are
about valuation or about funding rounds – those are the ones they make
paid. Which is also fair because if you’re in the industry and you’re
a fund, you can definitely afford to pay for some of those
memberships.

If you’re someone who’s just looking for news or startup-related
articles, and not particularly so much about VC, then it’s different.
It’s also not a massive percentage of those articles that are paid
for. I think at the moment it’s probably like 20% or so, not even, but
those are the ones that are super interesting.

[00:16:12] Don’t underestimate FOMO

VINCENT: I think we shouldn’t underestimate FOMO (Fear of Missing
Out). FOMO is selling a lot of tickets and a lot of content. I can
actually talk from experience. So this is free, but maybe ultimately
we’ll be competing at some point. I’ve created a newsletter this year
with people that you might know in this room: Willy Braun, founder of
daphni and Nicolas Colin of The Family. We’re curating what VCs are
writing every week. You can’t even imagine the number of VCs that are
emailing us ahead of Thursday – when we publish it – to make sure they
are on the list. And honestly, we are not even a media. We have a
pretty small database, but still people care about it.

ANA: I do agree with you also on the fact that media are smart in the
way they’re presenting things. What I’ve noticed with Sifted content
is that this content is presented in the way that VCs are used to see.
So like reports and data intelligence. So basically Sifted is
**speaking the right language to VC therefore it’s easy to bring them
together.** And yes, I agree, the word event is basically sort of, you
know, in a body copy. So no one is actually stressed about it. It’s
presented more as an opportunity for VCs to discuss and build
relationships with media. And that’s another thing that we’re looking
for anyway, just to save on PR agents.

VINCENT: Yeah. And, and to your point, I think what Sifted is doing
super well is getting a European voice and a real editorial standpoint
on things. And I wish that they would do even more big pieces about
Europe versus China, Europe versus Africa, Europe versus the US
because we have very different ecosystems and really need to
understand how we build bridges.

ANA: Yeah. And Sifted has actually a very digestible way to produce
this content. Like if you look at a Pitchbook or Dealroom reports,
they’re dry, right. Because it still has this more **startup feel to
it and you’re actually enjoying it the way you read it.** However, one
thing that I was surprised about is, you know, when I think about it
is that Tech.eu produced those reports for a good few years now. And
somehow Sifted is doing it now. There is this FOMO to do it, but you
know, the value is involved.

[00:20:30] Creating a different angle

VINCENT: Something I would say is that what I find amazing in the
press is competition. I think you need to have a different angle,
different journalists, different point of view, and Tech.eu for
example, took a very clear angle. They do a lot of opinion pieces and
they really want to be very collaborative and they are clear about
this. I think Sifted has a more enhanced digital strategy when it
comes to what they really want to push and because of the format of
their newsletter and just what they stand for.

BEN: Can I ask you, and now that you started to say, you know, things
that you wouldn’t like to be recorded, what are the worst European
outlets?

VINCENT: I have names, but you know, these people are running
businesses and this is pretty hard. I wouldn’t be even capable of
doing a third of what they are doing. So I wouldn’t name and shame.
Honestly, it’s very hard to build a media and get an outlet.

BEN: Well done. Okay. You escape.

[00:22:10] The value of Selected by Sesamers

BEN: Let’s go and talk just shortly. Like I’m going to branch out,
Selected by Sesamers. We’re not really a media. I know. We try to
bundle everything that is out there. So we do content with the member
base, you know, paywalls, all that stuff. You’re among the first to
join, as as a member – actually as an annual member, I sold you into
like, it’s going to be easier for you to pay only once, you know, you
get one invoice, happy, everybody, you know, accounting is happy. Tell
us, I mean, okay, we’re friends. So maybe it’s also because of this.
Why are you a member (of Selected by Sesamers)? How do you use it?
What is interesting about having access to calendar of events in your
job? You know, I’m not just doing this for the sake of you. Like, you
know, tapping me like saying yeah, great job, Ben, but actually say
also what it’s missing and what’s, you know? Give us an opinion.

VINCENT: The reason why I paid for it is because I had a business
opportunity here for me. I spend a lot of time screening events and
it’s really hard. And one of the hardest part of my job is
prioritizing what I’m going to engage with or not. You guys are the
experts. The conversation that we have right now is super valuable
because we are a community and it’s not only you and I talking about
it. When we say something that is a bit off the road, we’re going to
have people on this grid saying, no I don’t agree. And this is going
to be interactive, so that’s why I’ve subscribed.

[00:24:50] How to use the Selected Calendars (or why you should start)

BEN: I’m using you as a customer case. Sorry for that. We’re going to
move to all the questions that I want to cover with you today, but you
actually using the (Selected) calendar. I’m saying these because we
know that among our paid members there are people didn’t get through
installing a calendar. You know, you actually use it and you kind of
review these with your team. Like you, you have the process around
like checking what events are coming up. And I’m also saying this
because here in the call, we have a couple of team members who spend,
you know, hours building those things. So it’s great to hear that it’s
actually valuable. Tell us about this. Like what do you, you know,
what, why is it useful and what do you need from a sort of evaluation
point of view? Like we said, you evaluate you then how do you decide
that in events is good?

VINCENT: So that’s two different questions. The reason why it’s super
useful is because I can plan in advance. I can’t miss the big ones,
but I just don’t know exactly when they’re going to happen. And if
they are in my calendar, I would see them and I would be like, “Oh, I
have to engage”. Or I have to reply to the event organizer and going
through my CRM and engage directly.
So that’s the calendar part. And then on the, how do I choose an
event? So when I don’t know the event, the [info on calendars and
Selected] was super insightful, I can get directly into the website
and actually find the description of the event before even asking
other people or going to the website, which is the hardest part of our
jobs, because cutting through the noise of all the events is really
hard.

VINCENT: And to be even honest and fair, you know this, because you
notice a bit about our strategy at Northzone, but I really don’t
engage with events at a senior level. I really try to make sure that
we at least are responding to the event organizers because there’s a
lot of inbounds. So we make sure that we have the top 20 events top of
mind and engage with them. And then for the others, I really try to
have an overview of what is good or not, because I won’t have the time
to do what you guys are doing in terms of research. So that’s what I’m
using the project for.

VINCENT: And we could talk about features that you have in the roadmap
that are super interesting as well. And I wish I could already use
them, but this is already solving a big part of my marketing problems.

BEN: Amazing. Thank you for this. And we’re going to, you know, quote
you and then use that, you know, billboards everywhere.

[00:28:11] Content works from vision

BEN:  You think that good content and events being part of it is
actually something that takes time. That takes expertise. They expect,
you know, quite the opposite of serendipity, that curating stuff. And
I’m wondering, you know, like it would like to, to share a bit more,
what is your point of view around content, you know, like the bigger
picture, not just events related.

VINCENT: So my thinking content and I’m pretty sure a lot of people in
this room who have marketing roles will understand most of the time
when you’re into marketing function, people expect you to produce the
content and be like, “Oh, we have an amazing product. Can you please
market it and go to the markets and sell it and, and, you know, build
content out of this?” But it’s not how content works. Content works
from vision.  And it’s very hard to find a founding team that has
vision around content. And this is, I think the hardest parts in a
marketer’s job is picking the right team that is going to provide you
with a lot of vision strategy and raw content.

VINCENT: And I think this is something that it’s very hard with VC.
Welcome to the community, Ana. And I really hope that you’re going to
have partners that are going to help you through this funnel of ideas,
but most of the time, VCs have a lot of ideas but they just never
conceptualize them. They would have gut feelings, they would have
amazing vision and would be innovative, but they wouldn’t know how to
editorialize these ideas.And this is the role of the marketer. Like
how do you make sure that, you know, out of everything that they say,
because they see a lot of things and have new ideas, you really spot
what makes them unique and what is going to drive the audience?

VINCENT: And this is what I’m doing with the partnership at Northzone.
I could spend hours every day on each partner to do some stuff for
them, but I can’t. I really need to spot what is unique. And
sometimes, you know, for one month, I’m going to spend a lot of time
with one of the partners because we have the serendipity, you know,
just makes us closer because we have something that we are talking
about. So now my job is to convert these discussions into concrete
opportunities because we basically went down the rabbit hole of
something.

[00:30:50] Putting a process in place

VINCENT: I would never enter my week and be like, Oh, what is
interesting this week? Let’s write about. And let’s do another article
about tips for founders. No, this is not how this works. And so this
is why, and I know we had thousands of discussions around this Ben, I
think it’s a very hard job in the long term because sometimes you’re
very creative and some other times you’re not.

VINCENT: Hence, you need to put in place processes to be sure that you
always produce content, stay top of mind. But my vision of content is
that it’s not a question of writing or processes which are tactics. So
most of the time people assume that talking about content or doing
great content is having an amazing person that is going to do
everything. No – it is a culture. You need to build this culture first
and you need to build this culture of creating content. I’m lucky with
Northzone because these people are producing a lot and I basically
just select what is going to be newsworthy or interesting for
entrepreneurs.

[00:32:03 ] Prioritizing content

BEN: So what you’re doing with the Northzone newsletter is the same as
with Capital Call? You basically have to curate what is worth going
in?

VINCENT: Yes. And it’s very hard because even though I have values
that are written in a Notion page, or, you know and a strategy, but
most of the time it’s going to be my gut feeling, my opinion on the
new cycles. This is really my role to make sure that on top of
curation, I prioritize well.

[00:33:00] Capital Call

BEN: Talking about Capital Call. I think there’s an interesting point
that we haven’t covered yet. So one of your objectives with these
newsletter is that you want to push VCs to write more, to share their
ideas more. And especially in Europe. And there’s a kind of a lobbying
element there that is maybe not really visible when people go and
subscribe, you know, I’m a subscriber. That’s great I can find some,
you know, maybe one or two articles that I can reuse for my own
reading list that I publish. So, you know, what is the behind the
door? Like? What is the bigger plan? Like do you expect to get VCs in
Europe to write more? Because there is an opportunity to lobby for
Europe as a place for entrepreneurship and so on. Can you explain
this?

VINCENT: You already said everything. A lot of VCs were pissed off.
This is unfortunate that it’s recorded. I think maybe – I’m not going
to name and shame – but a lot of VCs are pissed off because we don’t
feature them and they spend a lot of time writing articles, but with
the brand name. So you would have “X” ventures writing an amazing
piece, super well written, and then signed by “X” ventures. It’s
already half of the work. You need to embody your opinions.

VINCENT: It is too easy to publish content without a person or without
a team. If it’s your intern that is building this, do put a name on
it. They deserve the exposure.

[00:34:49] VC & Media, Vincent’s Take Away

VINCENT: So I think that this is the point that we are making with
Capital Call is that we always complained that we haven’t been vocal
about our ecosystem and we complain that when it’s (unnamed American
VCs) coming into town basically saying, “We’re going to conquer you.
We know better Europe. We hired amazing people in Europe and we now
are going to invest in Europe.” Well, they know how to shape a
narrative. It’s amazing. And we don’t, and this is what we’re trying
to do with Capital Call. We tried to say to VCs, if you don’t want
these VCs to overtake the media attention, write, do interviews, go to
the press.****

VINCENT: This is something I talk about with Sifted and Tech.eu, for
example, they don’t have a lot of interaction with VCs because when
VCs come to them, they come with news. They have something to announce
and, you need to publish it because it’s important for my business
that people notice… No, the way you create relationships (and this
is the point with Capital Call) is that you really need to shape an
opinion.

VINCENT: We have a have a lot of great VCs that we may know in our
circles, but we just don’t know what they stand for. And they have
been backing companies like Spotify, Kahoot!, Datadog, Deliveroo, but
they never wrote something. Or when they did it’s ghostwritten and
it’s obvious. I think they need to take up their pen and stand for
something. We come to the same conclusion that we needed to drive FOMO
around this.

VINCENT: One of the main firms we feature is is Point Nine Capital.
They are doing a lot for the entrepreneurial community and the big
names are not. And I think this is this important to highlight.

you might also like

9tlabs team at JEC World
Events 4 days ago

A startup event strategy needs the same discipline. Spend enough time around (deep-tech) startups and you start noticing a familiar pattern. The same founders appear at event after event: a composites conference this week, a startup competition the next, followed by an investor summit, a sustainability conference and another pitching session. The logic is understandable. Young companies need visibility, customers and investors, and there is always the hope that the next event will provide the breakthrough introduction. The problem is that events can very quickly become an activity rather than a strategy. Teams return with business cards, LinkedIn connections and a sense of having had many interesting conversations, yet surprisingly little changes in the months that follow. For startups, where both cash and management attention are scarce resources, this is an expensive habit. I prefer to think about events through the lens of sport. A serious athlete does not try to peak every weekend. A season is built around a small number of A-events: the competitions where performance really matters. Everything around them is preparation. Startups should approach their event calendars in much the same way: select a limited number of events, understand exactly why they matter, prepare for them months in advance and then execute with intensity. Building your brand versus going where your customers are There are, in my view, two main reasons for a startup to attend events. The first is to build a brand, which for a young industrial company is largely about building trust. An established supplier enters the market with years or decades of history, references and relationships behind its name. A startup has none of that. Particularly in composites, where qualification cycles are long and customers are understandably cautious about introducing new materials and manufacturing technologies, familiarity matters. For a startup, brand building is ultimately trust building. This is why a composites startup should establish itself visibly within the composites ecosystem. JEC World in Paris is the reference. This is where I experimented a lot to master the game when I was leading the marketing and business development activities at 9T Labs – see picture above. Depending on geographic priorities, CAMX may play a similar role in North America, alongside relevant events in China and regional events in markets such as DACH, India or Southeast Asia. At these industry events, I would encourage startups to be relatively broad. Speak with suppliers, potential customers, competitors, investors and people from applications you may not yet have considered. Explain the technology in depth. The objective is not only to generate immediate leads, but to anchor the company in people’s minds as a serious part of the composites industry. This is also where I believe having your own booth matters. If brand building is one of the objectives, visibility cannot be an afterthought. Many manufacturing and materials companies still take a fairly conservative approach to exhibition design, which actually creates an opportunity for startups. Make the company visible from a distance. Bring parts, samples and, where practical, machinery. Demonstrate the technology rather than covering the walls with paragraphs explaining it. Give visitors something they want to touch, discuss or photograph. You are a startup. You do not have to look like everybody else. And at the events where you are building your brand, you probably should not. The second reason for attending events is much more targeted: meeting the people who can move the business forward. Once a startup has selected its beachhead markets, its event strategy should follow those customers. If aerospace is a priority, composite events alone are not sufficient; you should also consider events such as the Paris Air Show or Farnborough. If aircraft interiors are specifically relevant, Aircraft Interiors Expo in Hamburg may be far more valuable than another general innovation conference. Find the reference events in the markets you have decided to win. And go where your customers go. The physical presence can be different there. You are not necessarily trying to build a major aerospace brand; you are trying to become a trusted supplier to aerospace companies. A smaller booth, a national pavilion, a startup zone or an association stand may therefore be entirely sufficient as a base for demonstrations and meetings. As customer relationships mature, an even stronger form of presence becomes possible: being represented on the booth of a customer or partner. If an established customer displays a component incorporating your technology and identifies you as the supplier, the credibility effect is difficult to replicate with your own marketing. You are no longer telling the market that the customer trusts you; the customer is demonstrating it publicly. Four A-events, prepared like campaigns Once the industry and end-market calendars have been mapped, prioritization becomes critical. My recommendation for most startups would be to identify no more than four genuine A-events per year. This does not mean attending only four events. There will always be smaller conferences, investor meetings and local gatherings worth visiting. But an A-event is different: it is an event around which a significant part of the organization aligns and for which the company is prepared to go all in. Four such events already mean running roughly one major campaign every quarter, because the event does not begin when the exhibition doors open. A-level events should be approached as two- to three-month campaigns, with the exhibition days at the heart of a much broader engagement effort. Proper preparation starts months earlier and should be reverse-planned from the event date. Four to six weeks before the event, for example, a startup could organize a webinar around a topic closely related to the problem it solves. Better still, where appropriate, it could host a small event at its own facility. The purpose should not be to spend 45 minutes explaining why the startup is wonderful. Bring in an external expert, a customer or a research partner. Share useful data or discuss an industry challenge. The aim is to aggregate a community around the problem where the company has something

The most digital companies in the world are opening coffee shops
Startups 2 weeks ago

The AI industry runs on GPUs, APIs and Discord servers. So why is an AI insurance startup valued at $4 billion signing a lease for a 24/7 café in Shoreditch? Corgi, the San Francisco insurtech that raised three rounds in eight weeks this summer (TechCrunch, July 2026), already runs two 24-hour cafés in San Francisco and Atlanta. Its London location on Great Eastern Street opens this month, with five more planned including New York (Sifted, July 2026). The pitch: give founders a place to work at 3am, and sell them AI liability insurance while they sip a “Brexspresso.” Is it working? The Mercury News reported in April that the San Francisco café was running at a loss with zero conversions to the insurance business (via Wikipedia). Investors funded three more rounds anyway. That tells you something about what the market believes physical presence is worth right now. AI companies are becoming event organizers Corgi is the extreme case. The pattern is everywhere. Anthropic held its first Code with Claude conference in May 2025 as a single-day event in San Francisco. One year later, it became an international tour: San Francisco on May 6, London on May 19, Tokyo on June 10, with a second SF day added because demand from independent developers exceeded capacity (Anthropic). OpenAI’s DevDay returns to San Francisco on September 29. ElevenLabs ran its Global Hackathon across 30 cities simultaneously last December and launched its own Summit. Lovable’s community events page lists hackathons from Barcelona to Bradford to Tbilisi, funded with credits and swag. Stripe, the company that made online payments invisible, now runs two event franchises: Stripe Sessions at Moscone Center in April, plus Stripe Tour, a global one-day roadshow hitting Paris, New York and other major cities. Even the investors backing these companies have become organizers. a16z presents Tech Week, a decentralized conference series across New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles that reached more than 740 events in New York alone in 2024 (Tech:NYC). The firm also runs a16z Build, an invite-only program of private dinners and retreats designed to connect early builders. A venture firm operating a citywide event franchise and a curated dinner circuit is a firm that treats community as an asset class. These are field marketing budgets that would have gone to paid social five years ago. When every feed is flooded with AI-generated content, a room full of verified humans becomes the scarce asset. The companies building the flood know this better than anyone. The money agrees While AI companies build community from scratch, institutional capital is buying live events at scale. Liberty Media completed its €4.2 billion acquisition of MotoGP in July 2025, adding it to a Formula One Group that also includes F1 and hospitality business Quint (Liberty Media). KKR acquired Superstruct Entertainment, operator of more than 80 festivals including Sziget, Sónar and Wacken Open Air, in a deal reported at €1.3 billion (Music Business Worldwide, June 2024). CVC joined as co-investor a few months later. And Ari Emanuel raised more than $2 billion from Apollo, RedBird and the Qatar Investment Authority to launch Mari, a holding company built to buy events: the Miami Open, the Madrid Open, Frieze, Barrett-Jackson (Bloomberg, October 2025). This week, Mari agreed to acquire ATG Entertainment, owner of 70 theaters across Broadway and the West End, in a deal reported at $6 billion (Axios, August 2026). “Live has only grown more powerful,” Emanuel said in the announcement. Read that list again. Sports, festivals, art fairs, theater. The smartest money in media is converging on one thesis: attention earned in person compounds in a way digital attention no longer does. What this means for founders Here is the contradiction worth sitting with. The companies automating knowledge work are the ones investing hardest in rooms, coffee and handshakes. They understand that when intelligence becomes a commodity, trust becomes the product. And trust still gets built face to face. For startup founders, the lesson is practical. Your customers, your investors and your future hires are recalibrating where they spend their scarce in-person time. The events that win their calendar slots will be smaller, more curated and more expensive to ignore. Where the two worlds meet If you work at an AI company or a scale-up that just discovered field marketing, here is the uncomfortable truth: the event industry has been perfecting this craft for decades. The people who run Web Summit, VivaTech or MWC have solved problems you are about to encounter, from audience acquisition costs to sponsor ROI to the logistics of moving 100,000 people through a venue. That is the room Sesame Summit puts you in. It is the conference of conferences: our annual gathering in Biarritz where leaders from Europe’s top event organizers meet the startups, investors and tech companies betting on IRL. Disclosure: I organize it, so read this with that in mind. But if the smartest money in media is paying billions for audiences that show up in person, spending two days with the people who build those audiences seems like a reasonable shortcut. If your company is doubling down on events this year, what would you want to learn from the organizers who have been doing this for 20 years?

Crowded exhibition hall with an empty startup village, only one startup exhibitor active.
Events 2 weeks ago

Picture this. A strategy director at a major exhibition calls with six weeks to go before the show. The brand new startup area has sold exactly one booth. The show runs on a multi-year cycle, so a failed launch means the whole concept probably gets cancelled before it gets a second chance. This is a composite of several conversations I’ve had this year, and the pattern is always the same. The organizer builds a startup area, assigns it to the existing sales team, waits, panics, then calls for help when the calendar has already decided the outcome. The diagnosis is simple: startup acquisition is a different business than exhibitor sales. Most organizers discover this too late. Here are the five reasons why. 1. They sell square meters to companies that buy outcomes A corporate exhibitor renews a booth the way it renews an insurance policy. There’s a budget line, a history, a floor plan discussion. The sales conversation is about location and dimensions. Startups have none of that. They buy pipeline, investor meetings, and proof that the show is worth their time. And their time is expensive: my rule of thumb is two full prep days for every event day, more if the team is small or the show is far. A founder deciding between your startup area and a customer roadshow is running an ROI calculation, and a rate card doesn’t answer it. A sales team trained on renewals and floor plans doesn’t speak this language. It’s nobody’s fault. It’s a different job. 2. They start the clock six months too late Startup areas usually get scoped after the main floor is sold. The launch lands a few months, sometimes a few weeks, before the show. Founders don’t work like that. They lock their event strategy two or three quarters ahead, because attending well requires prep: outreach, meeting scheduling, demo logistics, travel. A six-week sprint is competing against decisions that were made in the spring. The paradox is that organizers know this about their corporate exhibitors, who book 12 to 18 months out. Somehow the assumption becomes that startups, the most resource-constrained companies on the floor, can be converted on short notice. 3. They design the offer around what they can administer Here’s a real example, anonymized. One show’s main startup offer was a 60 percent discount, funded by a national grant. Great deal. One catch: only domestic startups qualified for it, at an international show. The offer wasn’t designed around the buyer. It was designed around available paperwork. The addressable pool shrank to a fraction of the relevant ecosystem, and everyone else got a full-price booth with no story attached. Startup offers that work are built the other way around: define which companies belong on that floor, then engineer the package (price, format, visibility, matchmaking) that makes their decision easy. Administration comes second. 4. They confuse margin kept with money made This one stings, because I’ve watched it happen twice this year. An organizer works with a partner on startup acquisition, hits targets, then decides to insource the next edition to keep the full margin. On a spreadsheet, it’s savings. In reality, the target gets missed, the area sits half-empty, and the organizer comes back mid-campaign asking for rescue. Some results are still possible at that point. The results a proper campaign would have delivered are gone. The full cost of insourcing shows up later: lost booth revenue, a weaker visitor experience in that zone, and a startup program that gets cancelled for “lack of demand.” Against that, the partner commission was the cheapest line on the P&L. 5. They run a program where they need a pipeline Startup acquisition compounds. Alumni come back. Competition applicants become exhibitors. Founders talk to each other, and a good experience at one edition sells the next one. None of that happens inside a one-off project. It requires a multi-year cadence: scouting, competitions, curated programs, follow-up between editions. Shows on two or four year cycles feel this the hardest, because a standalone approach means restarting from zero every single time, with a new team and no institutional memory. What compounding looks like JEC World, the composites industry show in Paris, is the counter-example, and yes, they’re our client, which is exactly the point. The startup work there is a bundle, built over multiple editions: a startup competition that lowers the barrier for first-time startup exhibitors, an Investor Day that brings capital to the floor and gives founders a concrete ROI reason to attend, and a startup village that gives them a curated home inside a very large show. Each piece feeds the others. Startups apply because clients & investors are there. Investors come because the startups are curated. And the ones that grow don’t disappear: they graduate into regular exhibitors. That’s the part most organizers miss. A startup exhibitor is just a first-time exhibitor. Treated well, they’re the cheapest exhibitor acquisition channel you’ll ever have. Treated as filler for a leftover corner of the floor plan, they don’t come back, and neither do the ones watching. The question for organizers If you run a show with a startup area, ask yourself one thing: is it a strategy or a floor plan decision? If the honest answer is the second one, here’s my prediction. The area launches late, gets staffed by a team hired to sell something else, underperforms, and quietly disappears from the next edition. The internal conclusion will be “startups don’t work for our show.” The real conclusion is that the approach didn’t. Startups work fine. They’re just customers who need to be sold to like startups. Disclosure: Sesamers sells startup acquisition and curation services to event organizers. JEC World is a client. Read accordingly.

Subscribe to
our Newsletter!

Stay at the forefront with our curated guide to the best upcoming Tech events.