Sesame Summit 2026 – application open

Building the Spanish DeepTech Ecosystem – Corporate partnerships (Part 4)

In my previous articles, I focused this DeepTech series on:

(1) Explaining the challenges of the Spanish DeepTech ecosystem

(2) Providing a solution to solve these challenges

(3) Defining the type of partnerships startups need to have to add value to the planet.

Now we can start exploring how to build synergies between DeepTech startups and companies to foster the Spanish DeepTech ecosystem.

Let’s jump into designing a platform for corporates to collaborate with DeepTech startups.

DeepTech startups face diverse challenges from funding to market access and technical / business expertise, among others. To access the resources they don’t have, startups rely on several stakeholders to help them address these specific needs.

Such collaborations are especially important for DeepTech startups since they find themselves at the crossroads of fundamental research and industrial application.

Universities, public institutions and investors have a key role to play in the development of the Spanish DeepTech Ecosystem, however companies – whether corporates or SMEs – are the only potential partners that meet all startups’ needs by combining technical, industrial and commercial resources and skills.

To implement the creation of a strong Spanish DeepTech Ecosystem we must understand three crucial steps:

(1) The key singularities DeepTech startups have (based on their maturity levels) …

(2) …to find the obstacles when establishing corporate partnerships…

(3) …to build a long-lasting platform that best adapts to collaboration between corporates and startups.

Instead of following a standard formula developed outside of the DeepTech environment, companies should define a clear framework to collaborate with startups in different stages.

The following information is taken from interviews with various Spanish universities (UPC, UPF, IQS, UB and UAB), Spanish SMEs, DeepTech experts and different reports such as “The Dawn of the DeepTech Ecosystem” by Hello Tomorrow & BCG.

Two middle age business workers smiling happy and confident. Working together with smile on face hand giving high five at the office
Photo by krakenimages / Unsplash

A new framework development

(1) Define a clear corporate innovation strategy

Companies interested in collaborating with DeepTech startups must find an appropriate balance between internal and external sourcing of innovation:

(a) Set up innovation objectives from the corporate perspective which may focus on:

  • Strengthening the core business
  • Expanding into adjacent areas related to the core business
  • Exploring and preparing for future market entry into unrelated business areas

(b) Search fields and innovation domain priorities

(c) Maturity profiles of the startups that the company wants to partner with

(d) Required resources for delivering the platform mission (dedicated budget, people, etc)

Once this strategy is clearly defined, we can jump to the next step: developing an agile environment and involving all business units.

(2) Build an agile environment

Embracing a standard methodology will veil significant challenges to companies. The better strategy is to focus on agility and engaging relevant people at the top management, project management and operational levels.

The optimal approach to take depends on the company, its objectives as well as the number and profile of startups the company wants to work with.

(a) Ensure lighter and faster processes: to improve interactions with small and agile startups, corporates should tailor their internal processes to handle more agile interactions; alternatively, they could create parallel processes and dedicated staff so the rest of the organisation can remain focused on business units. The most important processes to adapt are: procurement, legal and financial.

(b) Set up adapted governance to ensure fast-track decision-making: top management can oversee relationships with startups when it has reached a critical level to ensure the framework aligns with corporate goals. Dedicated experts from the company can serve as project managers for the collaboration. The startup benefits from corporate knowledge whereas corporates foster internal cultural change toward entrepreneurship.

(c) De-risk the technology before involving the business operationally: protecting the business from the risk of the collaboration at its earliest stage by setting up a team to de-risk projects for a defined period.

(d) Give startups easy access to corporate resources: when possible, corporates should allow startups to navigate freely through its resources for a specific period of time under a protective data usage policy. This not only helps startups become a potential business partner but it also spreads an entrepreneurial spirit in organisations and valorizes sleeping IP.

(e ) Adapt KPIs to track long-term results: collaboration with startups requires different processes and KPIs to ensure their results. Most corporates struggle with this. The right balance between financial and strategic metrics will depend on the collaboration mandate and should reflect: the knowledge acquisition in early technology stages and financial impact in late maturity stages. A 100% financial orientation will lose innovation objective and a 100% strategic focus will lose financial impact which must be considered at some point. The KPIs should be clear and corporates should share the reporting with the startup and within the company through regular communication.

(3) Initiate collaboration

Before structuring the relationship, corporates should consider a less formal relationship, as a temporary transition, with limited commitment on both sides so the startup can demonstrate its potential as a business partner, clarify what is has to gain in the partnership and test the teams’ complementarity.

(a) Share a common objective: both parties should be transparent about their real objectives and if possible they should jointly define the desired endgame (who does what, who pays what and who owns what).

(b) Address IP rights and exclusivity upfront: establish from the beginning a clear relationship of who owns the IP and whether there is any exclusivity, or not.

(c) Find short-term wins that will help parties quickly challenge and improve the value proposition, test the complementarity of the startup and corporate teams and build momentum through a short but intense period. It also helps bring financial resources to the startup prior to emergence of the final product and market.

(d) Agree on a common roadmap with clear milestones that will allow parties to define together the most efficient path to the common goal. Each milestone offers the opportunity to confirm or change the next milestone, go to the next level or stop the relationship.

(e ) Review the target and roadmap regularly: agility is crucial when exploring relationships driven by an opportunity. Example: explore the potential applications of a technology rather than a corporate looking to find a supplier for a specific product.

(f) Pay attention to startup cash flow.

(g) Design a suitable contract that ensures alignment of interests and fair repartition of the value created.

(4) Detail your collaboration

When establishing collaboration between the corporate and the startup, they must decide whether to reach specific business or financial goals, and when to stop.

(a) Set up a partnership to reach specific business goals based on the different technology maturity level of a startup and, its readiness in the market, partnerships vary. A product development partnership should be set up when the technology is in an early-mid stage maturity (TRL 1-7). Conditions may vary based on their high or low market readiness. On the contrary, when the startup is in the late stage, two partnerships come up: go-to-market partnership (when there is a low market readiness) and commercial partnership (when there is a high market readiness).

(b) Weigh the value of an exclusivity-based relationship: this can limit the startup exposure to other stakeholders in the ecosystem hurting the changes for success. The best practice might be to introduce the startup solution to other non-competing corporates as the knowledge startups gain from these other organisations will often benefit the original collaboration. Whenever exclusivity is introduced, it should focus on late-stage startups, be limited to a specific market or geography and period time to set up collaboration milestones and/or offer startups specific and advantageous conditions in return.

(c ) Leverage corporate venture capital (CVC) to reach financial and strategic goals: startups look more to corporates for market access and technical expertise than for funding. However funding can occur internally through CVC or investments in a venture fund not directly tied to the company. Besides supporting a potential business partner, CVC can be powerful to align corporate and startup strategies.

To conclude, a corporate should not limit its relationship with a startup to a one-to-one relationship. Corporates must make startups part of a broader community and engage them with other startups, companies, investors, suppliers, customers and scientists to help build a connected ecosystem that can accomplish several things:

(1) De-risk its startups portfolio

(2) Increase portfolio visibility

(3) Better understand the ecosystem through a broad range of technologies

(4) Enable startups to help and mentor each other

(5) Propose a value proposition attractive enough for startups to join the company

(6) Acquire weight in the industry to impose new standards

New ways of collaboration can be set among corporates and startups. More agility is needed when collaboration arises between corporates and startups and new procedures must be implemented so the relationship can grow efficiently.


Coming up next, we’ll explore how corporates leverage their indicators so they can better adapt to DeepTech startups’ advancements. In addition, we’ll find out more about the best KPIs corporates need to set up to best monitor their DeepTech startups portfolio.

Stay tuned for Part 5 of our Spanish DeepTech ecosystem series!

you might also like

Fundraising 2 days ago

European impact investing is gaining unprecedented momentum as institutional capital increasingly demands measurable social and environmental returns alongside financial performance. This shift has created fertile ground for specialised funds that can navigate the complex intersection of profit and purpose, particularly as EU regulations like the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation reshape the investment landscape. Rubio Impact Ventures has successfully closed its third fund at €70 million, reinforcing its distinctive approach of tying 100% of investments to measurable impact outcomes. The Madrid-based venture capital firm has established itself as a leading voice in European impact investing, demonstrating that rigorous impact measurement and strong financial returns need not be mutually exclusive. Impact investing fund closure signals sector maturation The successful closure of Rubio’s third fund reflects growing investor appetite for impact-focused strategies across Europe. Unlike traditional ESG approaches that often apply impact considerations as an overlay, Rubio’s methodology embeds impact measurement into every investment decision from day one. This comprehensive approach resonates particularly well with European institutional investors who face increasing regulatory pressure to demonstrate genuine sustainability credentials. The fund’s investor base comprises a mix of family offices, institutional investors, and impact-focused limited partners across Europe, highlighting the broadening appeal of impact investing beyond traditional philanthropic circles. Rubio’s track record of delivering both measurable impact and competitive financial returns has enabled it to attract capital from investors who previously viewed impact investing as requiring financial trade-offs. “Our third fund represents not just capital, but a mandate to prove that impact and returns are complementary forces,” explains the fund’s investment team. “European startups are uniquely positioned to lead global impact innovation, particularly in areas where regulatory frameworks create competitive advantages.” European impact startups attract focused capital Rubio’s investment thesis centres on European startups addressing sustainability challenges through technology-driven solutions. The firm’s portfolio spans sectors including clean technology, circular economy, social impact, and sustainable agriculture—areas where European companies often benefit from supportive regulatory environments and sophisticated consumer demand for sustainable alternatives. The €70 million fund size positions Rubio to lead Series A and B rounds for European impact startups, a critical funding gap in the market. Many impact-focused companies struggle to scale beyond seed funding, as traditional venture capital firms often lack the specialised expertise to evaluate impact metrics alongside financial projections. Rubio’s dedicated approach addresses this market inefficiency directly. The fund’s 100% impact-tied investment approach requires portfolio companies to establish clear, measurable impact objectives that align with UN Sustainable Development Goals. This methodology provides both entrepreneurs and investors with concrete frameworks for tracking progress beyond traditional financial metrics, creating accountability structures that drive genuine impact outcomes. This successful fund closure signals growing maturation within European impact investing, where specialised capital increasingly flows to startups that can demonstrate both scalable business models and measurable positive impact. As European markets continue prioritising sustainability across all sectors, focused impact funds like Rubio’s third vehicle are becoming essential infrastructure for the continent’s transition to a more sustainable economy.

Fundraising 2 days ago

Impact measurement in European business is shifting from optional add-on to strategic necessity. As sustainability regulations tighten across the EU and stakeholder capitalism gains momentum, startups building the infrastructure for measurable impact are attracting serious attention. Contribe exemplifies this trend, having just secured €1.3 million in pre-seed funding to accelerate its impact measurement platform across European markets. The funding round positions Contribe at the intersection of two powerful European movements: the regulatory push for transparent impact reporting and the growing demand from investors for quantifiable sustainability metrics. Pre-seed funding round attracts impact-focused investors While the specific investors in Contribe’s €1.3 million pre-seed round remain undisclosed, the funding reflects a broader European appetite for impact measurement solutions. European VCs are increasingly prioritising startups that can quantify and optimise social and environmental outcomes, particularly as EU regulations like the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) create compliance requirements. The pre-seed timing suggests Contribe is positioning itself ahead of the regulatory curve. With CSRD requirements rolling out progressively through 2026, companies across Europe will need robust impact measurement systems. This regulatory tailwind creates a compelling investment thesis for early-stage funds focused on regulatory technology and sustainability infrastructure. Impact-focused investors are drawn to platforms that can standardise measurement across diverse sectors and geographies – a particular challenge in Europe’s fragmented market landscape. The funding will likely support Contribe’s efforts to build scalable measurement frameworks that work across different European regulatory environments. Impact platform targets European compliance landscape Contribe’s platform addresses a critical gap in European impact measurement infrastructure. While traditional metrics focus on financial returns, Contribe enables organisations to quantify social and environmental outcomes using standardised methodologies. This capability becomes increasingly valuable as European businesses face mounting pressure to demonstrate measurable impact alongside profitability. The platform’s approach aligns with European preferences for collaborative, stakeholder-driven business models rather than purely profit-maximising approaches. By providing transparent measurement tools, Contribe supports the broader European vision of sustainable capitalism that balances multiple bottom lines. The €1.3 million funding will likely focus on product development and market expansion across key European markets. Given the diverse regulatory requirements across EU member states, Contribe must build flexibility into its platform while maintaining standardisation – a complex technical and commercial challenge that could determine its competitive position. European organisations increasingly require impact measurement solutions that integrate with existing business processes rather than operating as standalone systems. This integration challenge represents both an opportunity and a technical hurdle for platforms like Contribe. The pre-seed funding signals confidence in Contribe’s ability to navigate Europe’s complex impact measurement landscape. As regulatory requirements intensify and stakeholder expectations evolve, platforms that can deliver accurate, standardised impact measurement will become essential infrastructure for European business.

Fundraising 2 days ago

The European venture capital landscape is witnessing a fascinating counter-trend. While many funds chase consensus picks and proven business models, a growing number of investors are deliberately seeking the outliers—the companies that don’t fit neat categories or follow traditional playbooks. This contrarian approach has found its latest expression in Amsterdam. henQ, the Dutch venture capital firm, has successfully closed its latest fund at €67.57 million, specifically targeting what they call “the odd ones out”—unconventional startups that other investors might overlook. The fund represents a bold statement in an increasingly homogenised venture landscape, where pattern recognition often trumps genuine innovation. For European founders building something truly different, this couldn’t come at a better time. The continent’s startup ecosystem has matured significantly, but with that maturity has come a certain conservatism amongst investors. henQ’s approach offers a refreshing alternative for entrepreneurs whose ventures don’t tick the usual boxes. Venture fund strategy targets overlooked opportunities henQ’s investment thesis centres on a fundamental belief that the most interesting opportunities often lie where others aren’t looking. The Dutch VC has built its reputation by backing companies that challenge conventional wisdom—startups that might be too early, too niche, or simply too unconventional for traditional funds. The €67.57 million fund positions henQ to make meaningful investments in companies across Europe, with particular focus on early-stage ventures that demonstrate genuine innovation rather than incremental improvements. Unlike many European VCs who increasingly mimic Silicon Valley investment patterns, henQ deliberately charts its own course. “We’re not interested in the obvious deals,” explains the fund’s approach to portfolio construction. “Our sweet spot is finding exceptional founders who are solving problems in ways that others dismiss as too risky or too different. These are often the investments that generate the most significant returns.” The fund’s strategy resonates particularly well within the Dutch tech ecosystem, where pragmatism and innovation have long coexisted. Amsterdam’s startup scene has produced numerous success stories by taking unconventional approaches to traditional problems, from Adyen’s unique payment processing architecture to Booking.com’s contrarian travel booking model. European market positioning and investment focus The timing of henQ’s fund closure reflects broader shifts in European venture capital. As the market has become more competitive, funds are increasingly differentiating themselves through specialized investment theses rather than generalist approaches. henQ’s focus on unconventional startups represents a calculated bet that the next wave of European unicorns will emerge from unexpected directions. The fund’s European focus is particularly strategic given the continent’s regulatory environment. EU frameworks like GDPR and the upcoming AI Act often favour companies that build privacy and compliance into their core architecture from day one—precisely the kind of foundational thinking that characterises henQ’s target investments. With this new fund, henQ can back companies across their growth journey, from pre-seed through Series A stages. The approach allows them to maintain conviction in their portfolio companies even when other investors might hesitate to follow on. This patient capital approach aligns well with European startup timelines, which often require longer development cycles than their US counterparts. The €67.57 million fund signals confidence in Europe’s capacity to generate genuine innovation beyond the well-trodden paths of fintech and SaaS. For European entrepreneurs building something genuinely different, henQ’s contrarian approach offers both capital and validation that unconventional thinking still has a place in venture capital.

Subscribe to
our Newsletter!

Stay at the forefront with our curated guide to the best upcoming Tech events.