Sesame Summit 2026 – application open

5 Ideas To Differentiate Your Upcoming Online Event

Now, almost one year into our remote and virtually driven lives, there has been a growing resolution that,  

  1. People are becoming negatively impacted by the added screen time and
  2. There is a growing amount of content.

Thus, since March 2020, the competition for people’s attention online is growing but in contrast with a less willing or more picky audience.

blank

In fact, even writing this piece has been an immense struggle for myself—and I’m a massive online content consumer.

This obsessive habit helped me to produce a two-day online conference back in June of this year. The results:

  • over 3,000 viewers with
  • an average view time of over 20 minutes (the average daily consumption of online videos per day is just over 50 minutes).

But today, it is a hard sell to get me to spend any amount of free time on a screen that doesn’t involve immediate gratification like video games, music, or other forms of direct entertainment like The Mandalorian.

blank

Education, online networking, blogging, etc. is all a bit of a struggle to captivate my attention but I don’t really need to inform you of this.

We all live in largely the same reality so I won’t elaborate any further on this point.

But what can we do about it? How can we compete with the growing swath of content out there and differentiate ourselves?

Below, I’ll share some thoughts on this and offer five ideas to differentiate your content. Some I have used, whereas others, I wanted to use but couldn’t because of capacity.

When creating content, whether it be for a live event, online conference, commercial, blog, etc. I consider what areas I will be competing on. If you generalize things, there are a three predominant areas you can compete in.

Competitive Battle Grounds:

  • Production Quality
  • Thought Leadership
  • Story Telling

Ideally, you want to excel at all three but in reality, you won’t have the budget of Disney, you won’t be able to source talent like Pedro Pascal, and you won’t get Jon Favreau to tell your story.

So, focus on your strengths.

For me, as I had a limited budget and limited access to global leaders, I chose to compete on Storytelling.

Storytelling can be the most cost-effective, provided you have experience in this space and creativity.

My background includes digital marketing and advertising with clients like 3M, BestBuy, General Mills, Microsoft, etc., so problem solving digital solutions to capture an online audience was a strong fit for me.

Know thyself and choose wisely.

Once you have decided on your weapon/s of choice then I recommend obsessively consuming as much content in that space as possible.

Please try to avoid burnout but that is easier said than done. Particularly if you want to do a good job understanding the market and finding where you can differentiate yourself.

Amazon has leadership principles to guide their company culture and hiring practices. Their #1 leadership principle is “Customer Obsession,” which essentially emphasizes that you are in dedicated service to your end consumer, or in my case, viewers.

If you want to create something truly valuable and unique, you have to go above and beyond—consuming a mass of online content is a part of that process.

Know thy competition.

Doing this, lead me down a path to find unique talent and pair them with startup founders to create something purely new.

For example, this collaboration between The Sushi Dragon, Ntention, and Manus VR lead to the creation of new tech, which was demoed live during our Startup Extreme online conference this June.

I am confident that utilizing a similar process will result in unique and differentiating results for whatever you are creating.

However, if you are still struggling with concepts or don’t agree with the “Customer Obsession” approach, here are my thoughts. Some tested and some untested.

If you implement any of them, please let me know via Twitter or LinkedIn, I’d love to see or participate.

5 Ideas To Differentiate Your Online Event:

  1. Live Calls—used in radio, live calls are an amazing way to engage and deepen your relationship with your audience. Allowing viewers to call you live and calling your viewers directly during your stream offers something honest and unexpected, which is compelling. Currently, a great example of this is during Marc Rebillet’s musical improv streams.
  2. Physical Tickets—if you have a friend passionate for music festivals, then you probably know they regularly keep their tickets as souvenirs. The world misses gathering together so something small like mailing your paid attendees a physical ticket would be a great gesture and a strong marketing tool to get attendees to remember you. If we are able to gather in person in 2021/22, you will be one of very few who has given them a physical reminder about your conference or event.
  3. 1-to-1 personal matchmaking via Phone Calls—something I really DO NOT like about online conferencing tools like Hopin is the very impersonal chat roulette like networking feature. It feels hollow and comes off as a quick fix feature to communicate “Hey look, you can engage with people here.” I very much, don’t like it as a standalone solution. If you have the resources, capacity, and don’t mind work that doesn’t scale, then I recommend doing some matchmaking for your audience yourself. The 1-3 calls you directly coordinate per attendee will be more appreciated and useful than forcing attendees to rely solely on the murky networking roulette waters.
  4. Integrate with other technologies—the Internet is an amazing place. It offers seemingly endless possibilities so why resort to a singular tool for an online event? It can be very limiting. The gaming industry is pretty innovative in Frankensteining online tools. You can do the same! For example, we used our streaming tools, Minecraft, and Discord to network a group of investors and startup founders together.
  5. Scheduled Screen Breaks—I haven’t seen this done yet, but in retrospect I wish it was something that we did. Running a multi-hour stream is a bad idea. Especially, if it is going to stretch beyond 120 minutes. You have zero hope of retaining your audience unless you are Adult Swim or some other heavy hitter. You’re better served focusing your content segments within the stream to be short (YouTube videos have their highest engagement when they are between 4-12 minutes long). If the entire stream is expected to last longer than 120 minutes, please facilitate screen breaks. These breaks can be related to the conference or event itself. For example, this would be a great time to schedule those networking phone calls… not video calls… it is a SCREEN BREAK.

If you want any additional details about how I implemented or would like to implement any of these ideas, you can reach me on Twitter or LinkedIn.

I’m happy to help, and good luck to you and your project—this is the way.

blank

Author bio:

Björn Lapakko has a background in product and brand marketing, working for various agencies and corporations across the US. In 2015, he left that world behind and ventured into the startup ecosystem, where he has spent the last 5 years living and working in the Nordics—building a seismic network and community of entrepreneurs, investors, friends, and makers. Currently, Björn is the Head of Startup Extreme—the most intense startup conference in the world.

Source material:

Media Consumption in the Age of COVID-19
blank

Research Indicates That Attention Spans Are Shortening
As mobile web become more prominent, its shorter visit duration, coupled with a decrease in visit durations on desktop, leads to an overall decrease in time users spend on sites.
blank

How Video Consumption is Changing in 2020 [New Research]
As video content continues to evolve with each new generation, marketers should continue researching consumers’ interests, hobbies, and behaviors.
blank

Online video in 2020: 6 essential creative rules that make all the difference
In today’s content-heavy social landscape, it is essential for brands to get online video right.
blank

you might also like

Fundraising 3 hours ago

London-based AI laboratory Ineffable Intelligence has emerged from stealth with a $1.1 billion seed round at a $5.1 billion post-money valuation, the company confirmed on 27 April 2026. The financing is the largest seed round ever raised by a European company and one of the largest first-money-in rounds in the global history of artificial intelligence. The round was co-led by Sequoia Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners. Participating investors included Nvidia, DST Global, Index Ventures, Google, and the UK Sovereign AI Fund, the British government’s recently established vehicle for backing strategic AI capacity on home soil. A bet on a different path to general intelligence Ineffable Intelligence was founded in 2025 by David Silver, the former Vice President of Reinforcement Learning at Google DeepMind and the principal architect of AlphaGo, AlphaZero and AlphaStar. He is joined by three further DeepMind alumni: Wojciech Czarnecki, Lasse Espeholt and Junhyuk Oh. All four have spent the past decade at the frontier of reinforcement learning research, the discipline behind some of the most consequential demonstrations of machine learning over the past ten years. The company describes its objective as building a “superlearner” — an AI system capable of acquiring knowledge directly from its own experience rather than from human-generated text or imagery. “Our mission is to make first contact with superintelligence,” Silver said in a statement accompanying the launch. “We are creating a superlearner that discovers all knowledge from its own experience, from elementary motor skills through to profound intellectual breakthroughs.” The framing is a deliberate departure from the dominant industry trajectory. Most leading AI laboratories, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Google DeepMind itself, have built large language models trained primarily on the corpus of the internet, then refined that training with human feedback. Ineffable’s wager is that the marginal returns on scaling text-based pretraining are diminishing and that the next leap in capability will come from agents that learn endlessly from the consequences of their own actions, in much the same way AlphaZero learnt the game of Go without studying any human matches. Why $1.1 billion at seed The size of the round is unusual even by the inflated standards of the 2026 AI capital cycle. Two factors appear to explain it. First, frontier reinforcement learning at the scale Ineffable describes is computationally extraordinarily expensive: the company will need to operate vast simulation environments and train very large models against them, an undertaking that consumes capital at a rate closer to physical R&D than to traditional software. Second, the round signals a strategic move by Europe’s investor and policy ecosystems to retain the most ambitious AI researchers on the continent. The presence of the UK Sovereign AI Fund alongside Sequoia, Lightspeed and Nvidia is the clearest expression of that intent. The British government has publicly framed the investment as a bet on breakthrough AI that “can discover new knowledge”, positioning the country as a willing co-investor in domestic frontier laboratories. For Ineffable, the implication is access not only to capital but to compute, regulatory engagement and the still-resilient academic talent base around UCL, Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial. Founder pledge of historic scale Alongside the funding announcement, Silver disclosed that he is committing 100 per cent of any personal proceeds from his Ineffable equity to charity via the Founders Pledge network — described by the organisation as the largest pledge in its history. At the round’s $5.1 billion valuation, that commitment could ultimately exceed several billion dollars if the company succeeds. It is a meaningful gesture in a sector where the reputational stakes around concentrated AI wealth are escalating, and one likely to be referenced in subsequent founder-led commitments. Implications for the European AI landscape Ineffable’s emergence reshapes the European AI map in three concrete ways. It establishes London as the home of the continent’s largest-ever seed-stage company, complicating Paris’s recent narrative of frontier-AI primacy after Mistral’s earlier rounds. It validates a thesis — that reinforcement learning, not transformer scaling, is the next frontier — that has lately been losing capital share to language-model incumbents. And it confirms that the UK government is now willing to act as a balance-sheet co-investor in domestic AI laboratories, a posture much closer to the French model than to the predominantly grant-based regimes elsewhere in Europe. The execution risk is non-trivial. Reinforcement learning at frontier scale has historically required years of careful environment design before producing competitive systems, and Ineffable’s “first contact” framing sets a high bar against which it will be judged. But for now, with a billion dollars on the balance sheet, four of the discipline’s most accomplished researchers in the founding team and a sovereign co-investor at its back, Ineffable Intelligence is the most heavily resourced new entrant in the European AI cycle. Sesamers covers European fundraising rounds across deeptech, fintech and AI. Source: tech.eu.

Fundraising 5 days ago

Belfast's Cloudsmith has raised $72M Series C led by TCV, with Insight Partners participating, to expand its artifact management platform and secure the AI-era software supply chain.

Fundraising 5 days ago

Berlin’s VREY has raised €3.3M seed led by Rubio Impact Ventures to roll out rooftop solar software for Germany’s multi-family buildings.

Subscribe to
our Newsletter!

Stay at the forefront with our curated guide to the best upcoming Tech events.