Sesame Summit 2026 – application open

SAFE Notes, Convertible Notes & Term Sheets: A Founder’s Guide

Early-stage fundraising rarely begins with a traditional priced equity round. Instead, most pre-seed and seed investments are structured using one of two instruments: SAFE notes (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) or convertible notes. Both allow startups to raise capital quickly without the cost and complexity of a full valuation negotiation — but they work differently, carry different risks, and are better suited to different situations. Understanding these instruments, along with the term sheets that govern later priced rounds, is essential knowledge for any founder raising capital.

This guide explains how each instrument works, when to use it, what to negotiate, and how they interact with your cap table — with specific attention to how European practice differs from the US.

What Is a SAFE Note?

A SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) is an investment contract created by Y Combinator in 2013 to simplify early-stage fundraising. It is not debt — there is no interest rate, no maturity date, and no repayment obligation. Instead, a SAFE gives the investor the right to receive equity in the company at a future date, typically when the company raises a priced round (such as a Series A).

The elegance of the SAFE is its simplicity. The standard Y Combinator SAFE is a five-page document with minimal negotiation points. There are no lawyers’ fees to negotiate complex terms, no board seats, and no ongoing governance obligations. For founders raising a quick pre-seed or seed round, a SAFE is the fastest path from handshake to wire transfer.

How SAFEs convert. When the company raises a subsequent priced round (the “qualifying financing”), the SAFE converts into equity — specifically, into the same class of shares issued in that round (typically Series A Preferred). The conversion price is determined by the terms negotiated in the SAFE, usually a valuation cap and/or a discount rate.

Valuation cap. The cap sets the maximum valuation at which the SAFE converts. If the SAFE has a €5 million cap and the Series A is priced at €15 million pre-money, the SAFE investor converts at €5 million — giving them significantly more shares per euro invested than the Series A investors. The cap protects early investors from excessive dilution if the company’s valuation increases substantially between the SAFE and the priced round.

Discount rate. Some SAFEs include a discount (typically 15-25%) applied to the price of the next round. If the Series A price per share is €10 and the SAFE has a 20% discount, the SAFE converts at €8 per share. Discounts can be used alone or in combination with a cap, in which case the investor gets whichever method produces the lower conversion price.

What Is a Convertible Note?

A convertible note is a short-term debt instrument that converts into equity at a future financing event. Unlike a SAFE, it is technically a loan — it carries an interest rate (typically 4-8% annually), has a maturity date (usually 18-24 months), and creates a legal obligation for the company to either repay the note or convert it to equity.

Convertible notes predate SAFEs by many years and remain widely used globally, particularly in Europe. The conversion mechanics are similar to SAFEs — the note converts at the next priced round, subject to a valuation cap and/or discount. However, the accrued interest on the note also converts, slightly increasing the investor’s ownership.

Maturity date implications. If the company has not raised a qualifying round by the maturity date, the note technically becomes due and payable. In practice, most founders and investors negotiate an extension rather than force repayment (which would likely bankrupt an early-stage startup). However, the maturity date gives investors leverage — and savvy investors use it to negotiate additional terms at extension.

Interest accrual. While the interest rates on convertible notes are modest (4-8%), the accrued interest converts to equity alongside the principal, slightly increasing the investor’s stake. On a €500,000 note at 6% over 18 months, the investor would convert €545,000 — not a dramatic difference, but it adds up across multiple notes.

SAFE vs Convertible Note: When to Use Each

The choice between a SAFE and a convertible note depends on jurisdiction, investor preferences, and the specific circumstances of the raise.

SAFEs are best suited for very early rounds (pre-seed and early seed) where speed is paramount and the investor base is primarily angels or seed funds familiar with the instrument. SAFEs are standard in the US, increasingly common in the UK and Nordics, and gaining traction across continental Europe. Their simplicity keeps legal costs low (often under €2,000) and allows founders to close individual investors independently over weeks, rather than needing to coordinate a single close.

Convertible notes are preferred in many European jurisdictions where the legal framework is better established for debt instruments. Germany, France, Switzerland, and the Benelux countries have well-developed convertible loan structures that local lawyers and investors understand deeply. France has its own variant — the BSA-AIR — which functions similarly to a SAFE but is adapted to French corporate law. Convertible notes are also preferred by investors who want the additional protection of a maturity date and interest accrual.

Practical considerations. If your investors are predominantly US-based or from the global angel/accelerator ecosystem, SAFEs are the path of least resistance. If your investors are European funds or local angels, ask what they typically use — forcing an unfamiliar instrument on investors slows the process and increases legal costs.

Key Terms to Negotiate

Whether using a SAFE or a convertible note, the most important terms to negotiate are the valuation cap and the discount rate. These determine how much of the company early investors will own when the instrument converts.

Setting the cap too low gives early investors an outsized stake and can create problems at Series A — incoming investors may demand the cap table be cleaned up, or may reduce their offer to compensate for the existing overhang. Setting the cap too high defeats the purpose of the instrument, as early investors receive little benefit for taking the highest risk.

A reasonable approach is to set the cap at a valuation you would be comfortable with as the pre-money valuation of a small seed round — typically €2 million to €6 million for European pre-seed/seed stage companies, depending on the sector and team strength.

Other terms to watch include pro-rata rights (the investor’s right to participate in future rounds to maintain their ownership percentage), most favoured nation (MFN) clauses (which ensure early investors get terms at least as good as later investors in the same round), and information rights (quarterly updates, financial statements).

Understanding Term Sheets for Priced Rounds

When a startup raises a Series A or later round, the investment is structured as a priced equity round governed by a term sheet. The term sheet is a non-binding document (with limited exceptions) that outlines the economic and governance terms of the investment. Once signed, it leads to binding definitive agreements (share purchase agreement, shareholders’ agreement, articles of association amendments).

Valuation and price per share. The pre-money valuation divided by the total shares outstanding gives the price per share. This determines how many shares the investor receives for their investment. European Series A valuations typically range from €10 million to €30 million pre-money, though AI and deeptech companies may command higher multiples.

Liquidation preferences. The standard in Europe is 1x non-participating preferred, meaning investors get their money back first in any exit (sale, IPO, or liquidation), then all shareholders share the remaining proceeds pro rata. Participating preferred — where investors get their money back AND share in the upside — is more investor-friendly and should be resisted by founders where possible.

Anti-dilution provisions. These protect investors if the company raises a future round at a lower valuation (a “down round”). Broad-based weighted average is the most common and fairest mechanism. Full ratchet anti-dilution is aggressive and can dramatically increase investor ownership at the expense of founders and employees.

Governance rights. Board composition, reserved matters (decisions requiring investor consent), and information rights are negotiated in the term sheet. Founders should pay close attention to the list of reserved matters — these can range from reasonable (approval of annual budget, major asset sales) to restrictive (consent for any hire above a certain salary, any contract above a certain value).

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

The most dangerous mistakes with early-stage instruments are those that create problems months or years later, often at Series A. Stacking too many SAFEs or convertible notes without tracking the cumulative dilution can lead to unpleasant surprises when they all convert simultaneously. A founder who has raised €1.5 million across six SAFEs may discover at Series A conversion that they have given away 40% of the company before the Series A investor even writes a cheque.

Inconsistent terms across multiple notes or SAFEs — different caps, different discounts, some with MFN clauses — create complex conversion scenarios that require careful modelling. Using a cap table tool like Carta, Ledgy (European-focused), or SeedLegals to track and model the conversion is strongly recommended.

Finally, founders should resist the temptation to raise too much on convertible instruments simply because it is easy. Every euro raised on a SAFE or note creates a future dilution event. If you need more than €2-3 million, consider structuring at least part of the round as a priced seed round — the additional cost and complexity are often worth the clarity it provides to all parties.

you might also like

Fundraising 3 hours ago

London-based AI laboratory Ineffable Intelligence has emerged from stealth with a $1.1 billion seed round at a $5.1 billion post-money valuation, the company confirmed on 27 April 2026. The financing is the largest seed round ever raised by a European company and one of the largest first-money-in rounds in the global history of artificial intelligence. The round was co-led by Sequoia Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners. Participating investors included Nvidia, DST Global, Index Ventures, Google, and the UK Sovereign AI Fund, the British government’s recently established vehicle for backing strategic AI capacity on home soil. A bet on a different path to general intelligence Ineffable Intelligence was founded in 2025 by David Silver, the former Vice President of Reinforcement Learning at Google DeepMind and the principal architect of AlphaGo, AlphaZero and AlphaStar. He is joined by three further DeepMind alumni: Wojciech Czarnecki, Lasse Espeholt and Junhyuk Oh. All four have spent the past decade at the frontier of reinforcement learning research, the discipline behind some of the most consequential demonstrations of machine learning over the past ten years. The company describes its objective as building a “superlearner” — an AI system capable of acquiring knowledge directly from its own experience rather than from human-generated text or imagery. “Our mission is to make first contact with superintelligence,” Silver said in a statement accompanying the launch. “We are creating a superlearner that discovers all knowledge from its own experience, from elementary motor skills through to profound intellectual breakthroughs.” The framing is a deliberate departure from the dominant industry trajectory. Most leading AI laboratories, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Google DeepMind itself, have built large language models trained primarily on the corpus of the internet, then refined that training with human feedback. Ineffable’s wager is that the marginal returns on scaling text-based pretraining are diminishing and that the next leap in capability will come from agents that learn endlessly from the consequences of their own actions, in much the same way AlphaZero learnt the game of Go without studying any human matches. Why $1.1 billion at seed The size of the round is unusual even by the inflated standards of the 2026 AI capital cycle. Two factors appear to explain it. First, frontier reinforcement learning at the scale Ineffable describes is computationally extraordinarily expensive: the company will need to operate vast simulation environments and train very large models against them, an undertaking that consumes capital at a rate closer to physical R&D than to traditional software. Second, the round signals a strategic move by Europe’s investor and policy ecosystems to retain the most ambitious AI researchers on the continent. The presence of the UK Sovereign AI Fund alongside Sequoia, Lightspeed and Nvidia is the clearest expression of that intent. The British government has publicly framed the investment as a bet on breakthrough AI that “can discover new knowledge”, positioning the country as a willing co-investor in domestic frontier laboratories. For Ineffable, the implication is access not only to capital but to compute, regulatory engagement and the still-resilient academic talent base around UCL, Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial. Founder pledge of historic scale Alongside the funding announcement, Silver disclosed that he is committing 100 per cent of any personal proceeds from his Ineffable equity to charity via the Founders Pledge network — described by the organisation as the largest pledge in its history. At the round’s $5.1 billion valuation, that commitment could ultimately exceed several billion dollars if the company succeeds. It is a meaningful gesture in a sector where the reputational stakes around concentrated AI wealth are escalating, and one likely to be referenced in subsequent founder-led commitments. Implications for the European AI landscape Ineffable’s emergence reshapes the European AI map in three concrete ways. It establishes London as the home of the continent’s largest-ever seed-stage company, complicating Paris’s recent narrative of frontier-AI primacy after Mistral’s earlier rounds. It validates a thesis — that reinforcement learning, not transformer scaling, is the next frontier — that has lately been losing capital share to language-model incumbents. And it confirms that the UK government is now willing to act as a balance-sheet co-investor in domestic AI laboratories, a posture much closer to the French model than to the predominantly grant-based regimes elsewhere in Europe. The execution risk is non-trivial. Reinforcement learning at frontier scale has historically required years of careful environment design before producing competitive systems, and Ineffable’s “first contact” framing sets a high bar against which it will be judged. But for now, with a billion dollars on the balance sheet, four of the discipline’s most accomplished researchers in the founding team and a sovereign co-investor at its back, Ineffable Intelligence is the most heavily resourced new entrant in the European AI cycle. Sesamers covers European fundraising rounds across deeptech, fintech and AI. Source: tech.eu.

Fundraising 5 days ago

Belfast's Cloudsmith has raised $72M Series C led by TCV, with Insight Partners participating, to expand its artifact management platform and secure the AI-era software supply chain.

Fundraising 5 days ago

Berlin’s VREY has raised €3.3M seed led by Rubio Impact Ventures to roll out rooftop solar software for Germany’s multi-family buildings.

Subscribe to
our Newsletter!

Stay at the forefront with our curated guide to the best upcoming Tech events.