Sesame Summit 2026 – application open

Dr. Jen Schradie – Show Notes

But fear not, we recorded everything. Below is the audio file from our Zoom meeting as well as a written transcription.

Dr. Jen Schradie provided a much needed context and structure around how and why and where conservative groups are highly organized and effective in influencing the outcomes of political elections.


On December 9 at 17h Paris time, Ben Costantini will host Natalia Brzezinski, Head of U.S. Strategy at the Swedish FinTech firm, Klarna. Together, the duo will discuss change and building for good.

The first half hour is open to all to attend, but you must register.

Register for Event



The second half hour of the event will feature a one-on-one/ask me anything session with Natalia and will be reserved exclusively for our Paid Members.


The Selected Salon 001 with Dr. Jen Schradie

[00:00:00]

Selected founder Ben Costantini welcomes participants.

“This is a monthly gathering of members around a topic that generates genuine conversations. And that will trigger a lively debate. It’s like an open forum and ask me anything, type of session.”

[00:02:00]

It’s going to be recorded and we’ll make data available afterwards. So don’t worry if you are missing a session for this first edition, just waiting to open the session to a few more participants including active contributors of selected by sesamers, the event guide for professionals.”

Housekeeping notes from Ben.

Talk Format – Q&A’s

Feel free to socially share this session tonight.

“Our topic today is when hashtags disrupt democracy, I’m really happy to do this today for several reasons.

[00:04:00]

Jen Schraddie is a sociologist and assistant professor. Her work has been featured in CNN, the BBC and the New Yorker, Washington Post, Time, Daily Beast, et cetera. She was awarded the public sociology alumni prize at the university of California, Berkeley and I directed like six documentary films. After her career as a documentary filmmaker, Jen received a master’s degree from Harvard Kennedy school and a PhD from the University of California, Berkeley in sociology.”

Ben outlines Dr. Schradie’s further work, and why her topic is particularly relevant considering the recent U.S. Presidential Election.

Jen discusses what she’s heard from friends in the U.S. and on the internet, but notes that not much celebration is taking place in France.

[00:07:00]

“Can you explain why it’s so complex in the U.S. to get the winner of the presidential elections?”

Jen breaks down how voting goes in the U.S. from national to state to county elections, and how each one of them has the own subsystems as well. “And a lot of that is based on State’s Rights.”

Further outlining of the process including the Electoral College.

Explanation of the balance of power via the Senate.

[00:10:00]

What are, and why swing states are influential.

“And it’s really not until  December 8th that States even have to resolve any kind of disputes.”

[00:11:00]

“Swing States that tend to be Republican and Democrat just among the middle. And that’s why the vote was relatively close in those States. Not as much as in 2016, but still relatively close.”

[00:11:27]

“How do you prefer to look at the results?”

[00:12:00]

Jen discusses how state by state maps aren’t quite effective because states themselves can have large areas of land all affiliated with the same political leanings.

[00:14:14]

Ben introduces the topic of campaign ad spend, and what portion of that budget is reserved solely for social media

[00:15:04]

Jen discusses that Obama campaign’s effective use of social media

“The fact that our democracy depends on money rather than the will of the people with basic information is very problematic.”

[00:17:00]

Jen lays the stage for data collection and analysis and how this method was used to engineer Brexit.

[00:19:00]

Jen outlines the effectiveness and power of grassroots organizations, their networks, and groups online.

[00:19:46]

“Tell us about right wing conspiracy theory groups such as Qanon.”

[00:20:21]

“So there’s a lot of conspiracy theorist focusing on, anti child sex trafficking and the thing that’s interesting about QAnon, is how it’s been reported. it’s this idea, It’s just this unique thing that’s popping up out of nowhere

[00:21:00]

and that’s not at all the case. Conservatives have been really focused on, on the one hand on child sex trafficking for years.

These very grassroots groups are really part of this recycling of information.”

[00:22:23]

“That’s a great way to transition into the second part of this conversation we’re having.”

[00:24:00]

Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.

Dan explains to his friends in the U.S. that Trump is merely a figure head.

[00:24:45]

Jen further outlines this statement and explains why and how it’s happened, and why the U.S. is in a Constitutional crisis at the moment.

[00:26:00]

“tangible, uh, hatred that I think both Clinton, but especially Obama had with some of these far right groups.”

“The work is not over in terms of what needs to happen because the folks that I started interviewing again, this was before 2016, before Trump even decided to run. And so much of the social media data that I collected during my interviews, so much of my observations by spending time with folks, Trump really

[00:27:00]

capitalized on that language and a lot of what we attribute to Trump, whether it’s fake news or other kind of catch phrases of Trump’s.

He has borrowed from grassroots and far right activists. And I think it’s really important to remember that now.”

[00:28:00]

Key aspects that make conservative groups more successful with digital media.

  • Structural Organization
  • Ideology
  • Digital Bureaucracy

[00:29:00]

Jen discusses the background data collection used for her book.

“So the early 2000 tens were a very euphoric time for digital activism. 2009, the beginnings of the so-called Arab spring, 2011, the Indignados in Spain that really started to spread throughout the world. Not so much in France at the time, and certainly in the U S. With the occupy wall street movement.

So, what does that mean? Basically? It means that people were saying, look, the internet is massively changing social movements. But only looking and analyzing social movements that had very advanced levels of digital use.”

[00:31:00]

“So this was the beginning of the use of hashtags. So really just focusing on something that already happened.”

Further explanation and information behind Jen’s study specifically detailing why she took the approach she did and what she hoped to gain from it.

“So I first picked the issue and then found which groups were organizing around the issue.”

[00:33:00]

“I tracked the entire Facebook, Twitter and website footprint of each of these 30, 34 groups.

At the time Facebook had its API open, so we could access a lot of this information. But there were some problems with it.”

Jen dives DEEP into social media usage and it’s effectiveness in the hands of conservatives.

[00:38:00]

Audience question from Vincent Touati-Tomas: “I learnt everything online and what we call a “Digital Native”. I was sold a dream that internet would reduce frontiers, and tech (an industry I work into) is actually doing worse today for democracy than a couple of years ago…. Why is it going into this direction and why are we building “Parler” applications instead of confronting ideas directly on Twitter? (Trump tweet deleted or recent Malaysian PM tweets on French). Happy to elaborate on this – would love to get your thoughts!”

[00:41:00]

“I think that’s the million dollar question, first of all, and it’s great you’re asking that question. I think you’re not alone.

[00:44:00]

All of us have friends in Normandy or elsewhere that don’t have high-speed internet access. There are still digital inequalities everywhere.

This isn’t a technological fix.

I think that’s something that white conservatives tend to be very active in the U S and all over, we see a rise in right wing populism everywhere in the world.”

[00:45:13]

Can you tell us a bit more about your views, about what’s going on here in Europe, in particular, I’m thinking like of cases like Brexit in the UK, you mentioned also here in France …

[00:47:00]

“These three findings of mine around inequality, institutions and ideology are everywhere. There is inequality.”

[00:49:00]

“The work of digital democracy is also everywhere. So it’s important to think about who is able to do some of this digital work, and who isn’t.

Um, what’s been fascinating for me is what has happened with other social movements. Historically. …  social movement information spreads much more quickly. It’s much more efficient.

So obviously there are those differences, but very quickly, what we find is that John is all of a sudden there was a lot of disinformation.”

[00:50:00]

“Over time institutions tend to dominate the question which type of institutions and who is running institutions.

The third issue of ideology in terms of the findings of my book and how that could be applied elsewhere, that’s the one that can depend on this political situation.

And that is the one that can have the biggest impact in terms of how people think about being motivated to use technology, how different political groups shift over time depending on what’s happening.”

“And that’s why I think it’s important to think about what, again, what’s happening on

[00:51:00]

the ground and not just what’s happening online.”

“It certainly was the case you had mentioned with Brexit. That was absolutely the case with Brexit.”

[00:51:22]

Thank you. We’re getting to the end.

When you did your research, snap, we’re just at the beginning, that you have tik tok.

We also have sort of accused, you know bots, troll farms, uh, and a lot of lie all the technologies to be very much active in what’s happening with digital media currently.

What do you think, you know, kind of down the line in terms of technical, like technological utopia, do you really expect that technology can sort of save our ass down the line or do we need to put ourselves into motion to take back control?

[00:52:43]

“You may be familiar with this idea of technological determinism. This idea that technology can solve all of our problems? No, I don’t think it’s technology that’s going to solve our problems.

It’s more a question of political power using different types of technology. I will point out that a very interesting new platform that conservatives have started to use. I will pronounce it, how they pronounce it, which is parlor, but it’s spelled parle. From the French word.”

[00:54:00]

“Should we continue to rely on big tech for democracy? And the answer is no.”

[00:54:25]

Audience Question: Dan Taylor: “Is there a link between geography and political affiliation? and more so, political alienation if you don’t fall in line?”

An example comparing voting colors and urban vs. rural geographic locations.

[00:56:05]

“Okay. So that’s a great, that’s a great question. …

I will respond with another swath of rural area which is what we call the black belt South. Where there were cotton plantations, where there was a large majority of slaves and slave owners. And that’s a largely rural area.”

“If you look at a map kind of County by County level in the United States, that swath of blue within the red is predominantly rural now. Yes, you have Atlanta. You have some big cities as well. But you have a lot of counties that are still majority African American so you also have the

[00:57:00]

confounding factors of race.”

[00:57:42]

Thank you, Jen. We’re getting to the end. What do you think will be happening in 2024 in short ?

[00:57:49]

“I think people are going to continue to organize and people like AOC and other progressive activists are going to continue to

[00:58:00]

organize and things will get be very, very different than they were this year, if that happens.

But I think that’s what needs to happen in order for there to be a shift, not only in the U.S., but elsewhere as well. Thank you.”

[00:58:13]

On the 9th of December and we’re having with us Natalia Brzezinski, who is now the Head of U.S strategy with Klarna, the Swedish FinTech and we’ll be talking about change and building for good. …

[00:59:13] Thank you. Bye.

you might also like

a wall of amplifiers
Events 2 hours ago

Europe recorded €108 billion from exhibitions and events in 2024, according to UFI’s latest data. The continent welcomed 102 million visitors to over 2,000 certified exhibitions across 17 countries; Web Summit Lisbon set a record with 71,528 attendees in November 2024, making it the largest edition to date; and Stockholm’s Techarena secured just over €1 million from VC firm BackingMinds to expand internationally. By any reasonable measure, Europe’s events space has absolutely crushed the events game. End of story. Fin. However, from where I’m sitting, the elephant is still lurking quite comfortably in the room. At the risk of being ostracized, I’ll go ahead and ask the question: Why are some of the most innovative companies on the planet still schlepping to Austin for SXSW to make their biggest announcements (Salt Lick and Stubbs BBQ’s aside)? The room vs. the world Looking at the numbers: Europe’s events spark more meaningful connections per square meter than anywhere else on Earth. In 2025, VivaTech set records with 180,000 visitors, a 10% increase from a year earlier. MWC Barcelona authoritatively anchors a circuit stretching from Kigali to Las Vegas. The continent plays host to an estimated 32,000 exhibitions annually, generating 4.3 million full-time equivalent jobs. These are numbers you cannot take lightly. But walk into any European tech conference and you’ll witness something that should make every one of us reach for the Advil: major announcements received by something akin to a boisterous golf clap from 500 or so people. And that’s it. Those announcements then usually disintegrate into the digital ether, seemingly never to be heard of again. Meanwhile, across the pond, a throwaway tweet about the same topic has the potential to garner upwards of 50,000 shares and three podcast invitations faster than you can drink your morning coffee. But data and numbers don’t lie, and when it comes to events, they’re frankly embarrassing. Europe’s events sector processes roughly €108 billion, and is  extraordinarily efficient in bringing decision makers together in the same space.  European startups consistently struggle with what should be the easier bit: translating those promising conversations into sustained media coverage, investor attention and market validation. The great muppet caper Picture this scene playing out roughly 847 times per week across Europe: Monday: A Finnish startup leveraging AI presents a true breakthrough in supply chain management/optimization/operations to 200 logistics executives at a specialized track. The demo is genuinely impressive. The potential is genuinely massive. The audience is the very definition of target market. All the right pieces are in all the right places. Tuesday: Three tech publications publish brief summaries, perhaps even covering the entire conference, and not just the logistics breakthrough. The fledgling company’s LinkedIn post gets 47 likes (including the founders’ mothers, university mates, and the intern). A single podcast interview is scheduled for three weeks later. It may or may not happen. Wednesday: The story is now less alive than disco was on July 13, 1979. Look that one up, kids. Now let’s compare the same actions to the American playbook, which, if I’m honest, makes me simultaneously impressed and nauseous. The same company makes the announcement at a Bay Area-based event (yep, you know it as well as I do). It generates immediate response across a variety of channels from some  truly influential voices and some noise makers, but enough to garner the attention of major media (print, podcast, and pulp) outlets within 48 hours. It then spawns derivative content, and creates a sustained conversation that drives real, true, business development for the startup for weeks. The difference here isn’t the quality of the innovation; it’s how the messaging was amplified. Folks, you can hate me for saying this, but this is where Europe is getting schooled. There is no stopping in the Red Zone Take one look at today’s media landscape, and you’ll leave with a rather morbid impression. The problem isn’t structural fragmentation; it’s an endemic contraction. Leon may be growing, but European tech media is shrinking,  at precisely the wrong moment. A brief reminder: TechCrunch, long the go-to outlet for European startup coverage, quietly shut down its entire European operation in 2025 when private equity firm Regent LP acquired the publication.  Digital Frontier, the London-based tech publication that launched in early 2024 with a team of 20, “paused” operations just a few months ago, making all 16 staff members redundant.  Business Insider cut 21% of its staff in 2025, citing “extreme traffic drops” and AI disruption. Just days ago, we all found out that The Next Web, once one of Europe’s flagship tech conferences and media brands, was shutting down its events and media operations after nearly 20 years. The Financial Times, which bought TNW in 2019, confirmed it was winding down the business by the end of September following a “strategic review.” Conference attendance had dropped to 4,500 in 2025, less than half of pre-pandemic levels. The failure to capture content The folks at Black Unicorn PR earlier this year put together a guide that reveals something anyone working in European tech media already knows but pretends isn’t true: “Unlike the U.S., which has a few dominant tech media outlets and an emerging class of star indie writers, Europe hasn’t yet consolidated its practitioners’ knowledge in one place.” Stop and think about what that really means for a second. Sure, we’ve got strong regional players, and I salute Sifted, EU-Startups, and Tech.eu doing the do. But the lack of a unified amplification machinery, by definition, puts Europe at a disadvantage over Silicon Valley stories that are destined to be heard in Phuket faster than you can finish reading this sentence. To put it bluntly, European tech events suffer from content capture failure. The most valuable insights surface within conversations, at roundtable discussions, and networking sessions that generate no permanent content.  Unlike American events, which increasingly operate as content factories designed for social media amplification, European conferences optimize to create value in the room rather than post-event content distribution. All that

blank
New Materials 19 hours ago

Winning the JEC Startup Booster's 2025 Sustainability Award transformed Strong by Form from a 'promising startup' into a serious player with industrial credibility.

blank
Consumer 7 days ago

Walking through the sprawling halls of IFA Berlin 2025, it’s immediately clear that this isn’t just another trade show. This year’s edition solidified IFA Next as Europe’s premier showcase of consumer technology startups, an event where innovation meets practical applications in a comprehensive hardware-focused startup environment. The heart of European consumer tech innovation IFA Next has evolved into Europe’s hub for the latest on consumer tech. It’s where the continent’s most promising hardware startups converge with global visionaries and industry pioneers. This isn’t just marketing speak — Hall H25, dedicated entirely to consumer-focused hardware, was in many ways the largest and most influential gathering of consumer technology startups in Europe. The centerpiece was the Dream Stage, where bold ideas are shared through keynotes, panels, and highly anticipated pitch battles. Unlike other tech conferences, IFA Next maintains laser focus on technologies that will directly impact how people live, work, and interact with their environments. The Dream Stage is also where Europe’s next consumer tech unicorns are spotted far before they take flight. The finale of this year’s IFA Next Pitch Battle 2025: Breakthrough Battle saw founders presenting concepts to investors, media, and industry experts, competing for visibility, investment, and growth opportunities. Complementing the Dream Stage was the IFA Lab, an interactive testing ground where exhibitors, investors and industry  professionals collaborate to bring innovations from prototype to store shelves. The Lab is where Europe’s startups refined their ideas, engaged with industry experts, and pushed new technologies from concept to market reality. Hall H25: Europe’s consumer tech capital Hall H25 was home to what has become Europe’s largest dedicated consumer technology startup space. Beyond the sheer numbers, the hall is an indicator of how mature Europe’s hardware ecosystem has become. IFA Next specifically champions hardware solutions that people can touch, use and integrate into their daily lives. The diversity and ambition on display were remarkable. Both European and international startups presented solutions spanning healthcare, sustainable products, and cutting-edge tech for everyday use.  What stood out Addressing a critical gap in healthcare technology that affects families across the world, Coro, which won an IFA Innovation Award, accurately measures milk supply in real-time during breastfeeding. This is exactly the kind of practical, user-oriented innovation that defines IFA Next’s positioning. LeydenJar Technologies‘ groundbreaking battery technology deserves special mention for fundamentally rethinking energy storage for everyday devices. This startup is tackling what will arguably be one of the biggest challenges for consumer electronics as AI-powered devices become ubiquitous in European homes: more energy storage while keeping the dimensions small. Dtablet’s medication management solutions address  healthcare challenges that affect millions of European families. Their focus on reducing dosing uncertainty represents the practical, user-centered approach that characterizes Europe’s tech startups. Paptic’s bio-based, recyclable packaging materials are made from renewable wood fibers, a distinctly European approach to sustainable products. The startup won multiple awards, demonstrating how European startups are leading global sustainability trends. Unframe showcased immersive applications combining virtual reality and artificial intelligence, a bellwether of  next-generation digital experiences. The startup’s user-centric approach to VR and AI reflects its emphasis on practical applications over pure technological spectacle. Broadcasting innovation: IFA’s Twitch strategy One of the most forward-thinking aspects of IFA 2025 was the creation of dedicated Twitch live rooms for presenting products and news in real-time. Modern users expect interactive, accessible content about the products that will impact their lives, so this integration of live streaming represents a crucial evolution in how innovations reach their intended audiences. Sessions like “Retro Tech Rewind” with IFA CEO Leif Lindner were specifically designed for Twitch, demonstrating IFA Next’s commitment to making innovation accessible beyond the convention floor. This approach to content delivery could set new standards for how European startups engage with their markets. Europe’s consumer tech ecosystem at scale What makes IFA Next compelling is its comprehensive approach to nurturing consumer-focused innovation. It’s not just about displaying finished products; the focus here is on creating an environment where startups can connect with VCs, retail partners, buyers, and over 4,500 journalists. This ecosystem brings together everything from AI-powered home devices, smartphones, laptops and sustainable products to smart health solutions and wearable technology. With dedicated spaces for both demonstrations and retail networking, IFA Next bridged the gap between cutting-edge research and retail opportunities, a critical pathway for European hardware startups. While cities like London, Berlin, and Amsterdam host numerous tech conferences, none of those events match IFA Next’s specific focus on hardware innovation or its ability to connect startups directly with the global consumer electronics retail ecosystem. Samsung’s strong AI focus Samsung has put in a lot of time and effort into comprehensively integrating AI across its consumer product ecosystem. Take for example Its AI-enabled refrigerator: besides keeping your groceries fresh, it can propose recipes, and even identify missing ingredients — it’s a masterclass in how established brands are setting the bar for startups to reach and surpass. Samsung also showcased its expansion beyond traditional consumer electronics into B2B applications. Its IoT systems and 3D building visualization software demonstrated how consumer tech innovations can scale into commercial applications — a pathway many European startups at IFA Next are actively pursuing. The future of European consumer tech IFA 2025 has demonstrated that Europe’s technology startup ecosystem isn’t just thriving — it’s defining global trends. From sustainable packaging solutions to revolutionary healthcare devices, European startups at IFA Next are solving real problems with practical, scalable solutions. The combination of established electronics giants setting innovation benchmarks, ambitious startups developing market-ready solutions, and innovative presentation formats showed that IFA Next has become more than Europe’s largest consumer tech startup showcase: It’s evolved into an essential preview of European technology leadership. For anyone interested in understanding where European consumer technology innovation is heading, IFA Next represents the definitive annual checkpoint. The innovations showcased here by European and international startups will likely be the everyday products of tomorrow, and Europe’s leadership in making that transformation happen is becoming undeniably clear. As Europe’s premier consumer tech startup showcase, IFA Next

Subscribe to
our Newsletter!

Stay at the forefront with our curated guide to the best upcoming Tech events.